verifier.org

Aiven alternatives

11 tools we tested head to head against Aiven, ranked — and what each one actually does differently.

last reviewed 30 jul 2026 · from our best 12 managed postgres providers ·list curated by Onur Ozcanxin

first — what you'd be leaving

Aiven ranks #2 of 12 in our managed postgres providers testing. one flat $150 across six different clouds, with networking genuinely free — and recovery behind a paywall..

84/100

the most portable option here and genuinely all-inclusive on networking — with point-in-time recovery you can only buy by upgrading tier.

why people look for an alternative
  • −no point-in-time recovery on the startup tier at all
  • −pitr requires a full tier upgrade, not an add-on
  • −connection pooling costs extra even on paid tiers
  • −no scale-to-zero — dedicated vm always running

stay with Aiven if same product across six underlying cloud providers is the thing you care about most — nothing below beats it on that.

the short version
best alternativeCrunchy Bridgeproduction databases where a predictable invoice matters more than a free tier.86/100best free optionAmazon RDS for PostgreSQLteams already inside aws who want the widest region coverage and reserved-instance discounts.82/100
advertisement
  1. 1

    Crunchy Bridge

    #1 in managed postgres providers · $150 with pooling, backups and egress all included — the only bill here you can predict exactly.

    86/100

    verdictthe most complete inclusive pricing in the category — everything you'd otherwise pay extra for is in the number — with a new owner worth watching.

    Crunchy Bridge vs Aiven
     AivenCrunchy Bridge
    price$150/mo at the anchor$150/mo at the anchor
    free tieryesno
    monthly at anchor$150$150
    egressfreefree
    backups and pitrbackup yes, pitr on businessincluded
    scale to zeronono
    free tier1 cpu / 1gb dedicated vmnone

    switch forproduction databases where a predictable invoice matters more than a free tier.

    pros
    • +pooling, backups and egress all included in the base price
    • +billed by the minute, prorated to the second
    • +42 regions across aws, azure and gcp
    • +publishes a worked pricing example matching real workloads
    cons
    • −acquired by snowflake — long-term roadmap uncertain
    • −no free tier at all
    • −no scale-to-zero for intermittent workloads
    • −high availability doubles the cluster price
    visit Crunchy Bridge →full Crunchy Bridge review →
  2. 2

    Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL

    #3 in managed postgres providers · the cheapest real instance here at $128 — before you add the pooler and the standby everyone needs.

    82/100

    verdictthe lowest verified instance cost in this ranking, on the understanding that pooling and high availability are both separate purchases.

    Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL vs Aiven
     AivenAmazon RDS for PostgreSQL
    price$150/mo at the anchor$127.57/mo at the anchor
    free tieryesyes
    monthly at anchor$150$127.57 single-az
    egressfree$0.09/gb past account-wide 100gb
    backups and pitrbackup yes, pitr on businessincluded in retention window
    scale to zeronono
    free tier1 cpu / 1gb dedicated vm12 months, new accounts only

    switch forteams already inside aws who want the widest region coverage and reserved-instance discounts.

    pros
    • +cheapest verified instance at the anchor spec
    • +30+ regions, the widest coverage here
    • +backups and pitr included within the retention window
    • +per-second billing and reserved-instance discounts
    cons
    • −connection pooling costs extra via rds proxy
    • −multi-az roughly doubles the compute cost
    • −egress allowance is account-wide, not per database
    • −no scale-to-zero on standard rds
    visit Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL →full Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL review →
  3. 3

    Supabase

    #4 in managed postgres providers · a whole platform for $147 — and point-in-time recovery at $100 a month per week of retention.

    80/100

    verdictthe best free tier here and a fair paid price for what's bundled — with a recovery add-on priced like a separate product.

    Supabase vs Aiven
     AivenSupabase
    price$150/mo at the anchor$146.50/mo at the anchor
    free tieryesyes
    monthly at anchor$150$146.50
    egressfree$0.09/gb past 250gb
    backups and pitrbackup yes, pitr on businessbackups free, pitr $100/wk
    scale to zeronofree tier only
    free tier1 cpu / 1gb dedicated vm500mb db, 5gb egress

    switch forteams who want auth, storage and edge functions alongside postgres rather than assembled separately.

    pros
    • +most generous free tier in this ranking
    • +auth, storage and edge functions bundled with postgres
    • +250gb egress included, covering the anchor entirely
    • +branching available at about $9.80 per branch-month
    cons
    • −pitr costs $100/mo per seven days of retention
    • −compute is additive to a mandatory $25 base fee
    • −free projects auto-pause after a week idle
    • −regions not listed on the pricing page
    visit Supabase →full Supabase review →
    advertisement
  4. 4

    Neon

    #5 in managed postgres providers · genuine scale-to-zero makes this the cheapest or the dearest option here, depending entirely on whether it's running.

    78/100

    verdictthe wrong tool for the workload we priced and the right one for most of the workloads people actually have.

    Neon vs Aiven
     AivenNeon
    price$150/mo at the anchor$189.76/mo always-on
    free tieryesyes
    monthly at anchor$150$189.76 always-on
    egressfree$0.10/gb past 500gb
    backups and pitrbackup yes, pitr on businessincluded via storage history
    scale to zeronoyes — default 5 min
    free tier1 cpu / 1gb dedicated vm100 cu-hours, 0.5gb

    switch fordevelopment, preview environments and spiky workloads — precisely not a database that runs all month.

    pros
    • +genuine scale-to-zero with configurable autosuspend
    • +cheapest branching here — 10 free, then $1.50 each
    • +pitr included via storage history, not an add-on
    • +no monthly minimums since december 2025
    cons
    • −most expensive real instance at an always-on workload
    • −azure projects must migrate by 5 october 2026
    • −acquired by databricks — roadmap direction unclear
    • −aws-only for new projects
    visit Neon →full Neon review →
  5. 5

    Xata

    #6 in managed postgres providers · the cheapest number in this ranking, from the vendor that publishes the fewest of the costs behind it.

    76/100

    verdicta third cheaper than the mid-field on the numbers it does publish — and you cannot construct a complete bill from its pricing page.

    Xata vs Aiven
     AivenXata
    price$150/mo at the anchor$98.08/mo at the anchor
    free tieryesno
    monthly at anchor$150$98.08 excl. egress
    egressfreenot published
    backups and pitrbackup yes, pitr on businessnot published
    scale to zeronoyes, idle branches
    free tier1 cpu / 1gb dedicated vmtrial only

    switch fordevelopment and agentic workloads wanting copy-on-write branching at the lowest compute rate.

    pros
    • +cheapest published rate at the anchor spec
    • +storage billed by the minute, compute hourly
    • +copy-on-write branching with shared deltas
    • +core open-sourced in april 2026, self-hostable
    cons
    • −egress pricing not published anywhere
    • −backup charges not published
    • −connection pooling not mentioned
    • −no persistent free tier — 14-day trial only
    visit Xata →full Xata review →
  6. 6

    Railway

    #7 in managed postgres providers · $142 with nothing rounded up — and no database features to speak of.

    72/100

    verdictthe most granular metering here with no tier sizes to overpay for — because there is no postgres product, just a container billed like any other.

    Railway vs Aiven
     AivenRailway
    price$150/mo at the anchor$142.49/mo at the anchor
    free tieryesno
    monthly at anchor$150$142.49
    egressfree$0.05/gb
    backups and pitrbackup yes, pitr on businessnot documented
    scale to zerononot confirmed
    free tier1 cpu / 1gb dedicated vm$1/mo credit

    switch forteams already deploying on railway who want the database beside their services.

    pros
    • +per-second billing on cpu, memory and storage
    • +cheapest metered egress here at $0.05/gb
    • +no instance tiers to overpay for
    • +sits alongside your application services
    cons
    • −no postgres-specific features documented
    • −pooling, pitr and backups all unstated
    • −autosuspend behaviour for postgres unconfirmed
    • −no meaningful free tier
    visit Railway →full Railway review →
  7. 7

    PlanetScale Postgres

    #8 in managed postgres providers · millisecond-accurate billing on a tier ladder with no rung where our workload fits.

    70/100

    verdictgenuinely good engineering priced against a tier ladder that makes our anchor look terrible — and no free tier to try it on.

    PlanetScale Postgres vs Aiven
     AivenPlanetScale Postgres
    price$150/mo at the anchor$297.25/mo at the anchor
    free tieryesno
    monthly at anchor$150$297.25 (oversized)
    egressfree$0.06-0.137/gb past 100gb
    backups and pitrbackup yes, pitr on businessbackups included
    scale to zeronono
    free tier1 cpu / 1gb dedicated vmnone — removed

    switch forteams wanting vitess-grade branching and backup tooling who can use the ram they're buying.

    pros
    • +billing prorated to the millisecond
    • +mature branching and backup model from vitess
    • +free backup storage at twice disk size per branch
    • +20+ regions across aws and gcp
    cons
    • −no 2 vcpu / 8gb tier — anchor forces 16gb
    • −free tier removed entirely
    • −egress rates vary by cloud and region
    • −dedicated pooler instances cost extra
    visit PlanetScale Postgres →full PlanetScale Postgres review →
  8. 8

    Prisma Postgres

    #9 in managed postgres providers · billed per database operation, which makes it either the cheapest thing here or uncomparable — and for our anchor, uncomparable.

    66/100

    verdicta genuinely different pricing model that suits a lot of real applications and cannot be placed against a fixed always-on workload.

    Prisma Postgres vs Aiven
     AivenPrisma Postgres
    price$150/mo at the anchor$129/mo base
    free tieryesyes
    monthly at anchor$150n/a — operation-based
    egressfree$0.08-0.09/gib after free tier
    backups and pitrbackup yes, pitr on businessincluded, 7-30 days
    scale to zeronoimplicit — no instance
    free tier1 cpu / 1gb dedicated vm100k operations, 500mb

    switch forlow-traffic and spiky applications where a provisioned instance would sit idle.

    pros
    • +no fixed cost when the database is idle
    • +free tier of 100,000 operations and fifty databases
    • +pooling and backups included with no add-ons
    • +storage allowance covers the anchor at the business tier
    cons
    • −operation-based billing can't be compared on a compute anchor
    • −cost unpredictable if query volume is unpredictable
    • −branching not documented on the pricing page
    • −regions not listed
    visit Prisma Postgres →full Prisma Postgres review →
  9. 9

    Tiger Cloud (formerly Timescale)

    #10 in managed postgres providers · no egress fees, no backup fees, and no rate card you can read without signing up.

    64/100

    verdictgenuinely good inclusive terms on the things it does publish, from the least transparent rate card of the twelve.

    Tiger Cloud (formerly Timescale) vs Aiven
     AivenTiger Cloud (formerly Timescale)
    price$150/mo at the anchornot published
    free tieryesno
    monthly at anchor$150not published
    egressfreefree
    backups and pitrbackup yes, pitr on businessincluded, tier-gated pitr
    scale to zerononot stated
    free tier1 cpu / 1gb dedicated vm30-day trial only

    switch fortime-series and analytics workloads where hypertables and continuous aggregates justify the opacity.

    pros
    • +no egress, ingest or data-transfer fees at all
    • +backups included with no separate charge
    • +time-series tooling on top of vanilla postgres
    • +30-day trial with no card required
    cons
    • −no public per-instance rate card at all
    • −pricing requires an account and in-product calculator
    • −pitr retention is tier-gated, not purchasable
    • −rebrand from timescale makes older references stale
    visit Tiger Cloud (formerly Timescale) →full Tiger Cloud (formerly Timescale) review →
  10. 10

    Render Postgres

    #11 in managed postgres providers · the free database isn't paused after thirty days — it's deleted.

    60/100

    verdictsensible per-second billing and tight app integration, sold from a page that won't show its own prices — and a free tier that destroys your data.

    Render Postgres vs Aiven
     AivenRender Postgres
    price$150/mo at the anchornot readable
    free tieryesyes
    monthly at anchor$150not readable
    egressfreenot published
    backups and pitrbackup yes, pitr on businessexists, price unconfirmed
    scale to zeronono
    free tier1 cpu / 1gb dedicated vmdeleted after 30 days

    switch forteams already running services on render who want the database in the same place.

    pros
    • +billing prorated to the second
    • +tight integration with render's app hosting
    • +wide tier range from $6 to $6,200
    • +storage overage clearly stated at $0.30/gb
    cons
    • −free database is deleted after 30 days, not paused
    • −pricing table won't render for verification
    • −egress, backup and pooling costs all unverified
    • −high availability doubles the price
    visit Render Postgres →full Render Postgres review →
+ 1 more tested, not detailed here
we ranked 12 managed postgres providers in total. the 1 that didn't make this page are written up in the full ranking →

how these were compared

every tool on this page went through the same test as Aiven — same tasks, same order, scored the same way. the comparison tables are the figures from that testing, not vendor spec sheets.

the managed postgres providers test in full →
was this useful?