verifier.org

Amazon SES alternatives

9 tools we tested head to head against Amazon SES, ranked — and what each one actually does differently.

last reviewed 27 jul 2026 · from our best 10 transactional email providers ·list curated by Onur Ozcanxin

first — what you'd be leaving

Amazon SES ranks #3 of 10 in our transactional email providers testing. $16 for a hundred thousand emails — an order of magnitude below the field, with an onboarding process that earns it..

87/100

nothing else is close on price, and nothing else makes you apply for permission to send — which of those matters more depends entirely on your volume.

why people look for an alternative
  • sandbox requires manual production-access approval
  • log retention undocumented on its own pages
  • no polished deliverability tooling at the base tier
  • pro and enterprise add $105 and $500 per region monthly

stay with Amazon SES if $16 at 100k emails — roughly a tenth of the mid-field is the thing you care about most — nothing below beats it on that.

the short version
best alternativeResenddevelopers who want the sending problem to disappear without auditing a pricing page every quarter.91/100
advertisement
  1. 1

    Resend

    #1 in transactional email providers · $35 for a hundred thousand emails, a month of logs, and the api the rest of the category is being measured against.

    91/100

    verdictless than half what mailgun and sendgrid charge at volume, with thirty days of history and a genuinely good api — the gaps are in what it hasn't documented, not what it does.

    Resend vs Amazon SES
     Amazon SESResend
    price$1.60/mo$20/mo
    free tiernoyes
    10k emails$1.60/mo$20/mo
    100k emails$16/mo$35/mo
    free tiernone (aws credits only)3,000/mo
    log retentionnot documented30 days
    eu regionyes, by regionnot documented

    switch fordevelopers who want the sending problem to disappear without auditing a pricing page every quarter.

    pros
    • +$35 at 100k emails — less than half the mid-field
    • +30-day log retention on standard plans
    • +react email templates and modern api ergonomics
    • +3,000 emails a month free
    cons
    • dedicated ip needs the scale plan plus $30/mo
    • eu data residency not documented on its own pages
    • inbound email support not stated
    • marketing mail billed per contact, not per send
  2. 2

    Postmark

    #2 in transactional email providers · the longest message history in the category and a price cut that made it competitive again — until you reach a hundred thousand.

    89/100

    verdictthe retention and reliability pick, dramatically better value at 10,000 emails than it was a year ago — and quietly the most expensive place on this page to send 100,000.

    Postmark vs Amazon SES
     Amazon SESPostmark
    price$1.60/mo$15/mo
    free tiernoyes
    10k emails$1.60/mo$15-16.50/mo
    100k emails$16/mo~$133 (derived)
    free tiernone (aws credits only)100/mo
    log retentionnot documented45 days, 365 for $5
    eu regionyes, by regionnot documented

    switch forteams whose support workload depends on being able to look up what happened to an email weeks later.

    pros
    • +45 days retention standard, 365 for $5/mo — best in class
    • +10k tier cut from $60.50 to $16.50 in 2025
    • +inbound processing included on pro
    • +unlimited daily sending volume on all plans
    cons
    • no printed price at 100k — must be derived from overage
    • roughly $133 at 100k, the most expensive here
    • dedicated ip costs $50/mo and needs 300k+ volume
    • basic plan omits inbound at the same email allowance as pro
  3. 3

    SMTP2GO

    #4 in transactional email providers · thirty days of logs as standard and two years if you'll pay — the most serious answer here to the question everyone forgets to ask.

    84/100

    verdictcheaper than postmark at scale with retention almost as good and extendable further — held back by how little it publishes about anything else.

    SMTP2GO vs Amazon SES
     Amazon SESSMTP2GO
    price$1.60/mo$10/mo
    free tiernoyes
    10k emails$1.60/mo$10/mo
    100k emails$16/mo$75/mo
    free tiernone (aws credits only)1,000/mo
    log retentionnot documented30 days, 2yr add-on
    eu regionyes, by regionnot documented

    switch foroperations teams who need long searchable history without postmark's price at volume.

    pros
    • +30 days retention standard, extendable to two years
    • +$75 at 100k undercuts mailgun and sendgrid
    • +free tier of 1,000 a month
    • +clear, simple volume tiers
    cons
    • dedicated ip cost not published anywhere reachable
    • no eu data-residency information
    • inbound email support not stated
    • free tier capped at 25 emails an hour
    advertisement
  4. 4

    MailerSend

    #5 in transactional email providers · the cheapest mid-field option at both anchor volumes, with retention that's honest about being tiered.

    81/100

    verdictexcellent value at both volumes and unusually clear about how retention scales — with figures we'd want you to re-check before you commit.

    MailerSend vs Amazon SES
     Amazon SESMailerSend
    price$1.60/mo~$5.60/mo
    free tiernoyes
    10k emails$1.60/mo~$5.60/mo
    100k emails$16/mo~$25/mo
    free tiernone (aws credits only)500/mo
    log retentionnot documented1-30 days by plan
    eu regionyes, by regionunconfirmed

    switch forcost-sensitive senders who will live with one day of history on the cheapest tier.

    pros
    • +cheapest non-aws option at both anchor volumes
    • +retention tiering published clearly by plan
    • +inbound routing on starter and above
    • +free tier of 500 emails a month
    cons
    • one day of retention on hobby
    • our price figures came from a rendered table, not quotable text
    • eu residency documentation returned 404
    • dedicated ip is enterprise-only and quote-priced
  5. 5

    Plunk

    #6 in transactional email providers · one price, one tenth of a cent an email, no tiers and no contact games — and no discount however much you send.

    77/100

    verdictthe most transparent pricing in the category by a distance, and the linearity that makes it honest at ten thousand makes it expensive at a hundred thousand.

    Plunk vs Amazon SES
     Amazon SESPlunk
    price$1.60/mo$10/mo
    free tiernoyes
    10k emails$1.60/mo$10/mo
    100k emails$16/mo$100/mo
    free tiernone (aws credits only)1,000/mo
    log retentionnot documentednot documented
    eu regionyes, by regionnot documented

    switch forsmall senders who value knowing exactly what next month costs over paying the least.

    pros
    • +flat $0.001 per email with no base fee or tiers
    • +unlimited contacts at no extra charge
    • +transactional and marketing billed identically
    • +1,000 emails a month free, forever
    cons
    • no volume discount at any scale — $100 at 100k
    • no dedicated ip information published
    • no eu residency or log retention documented
    • inbound email support not stated
  6. 6

    Mailgun

    #7 in transactional email providers · eu residency stated plainly on the pricing page, attached to a plan that forgets your mail after twenty-four hours.

    74/100

    verdicta capable, well-established platform whose entry plan has the worst retention here — one day — on exactly the tier most small senders buy.

    Mailgun vs Amazon SES
     Amazon SESMailgun
    price$1.60/mo$15/mo
    free tiernoyes
    10k emails$1.60/mo$15/mo
    100k emails$16/mo$90/mo
    free tiernone (aws credits only)100/day
    log retentionnot documented1-30 days by plan
    eu regionyes, by regionyes, stated

    switch foreu-based senders at scale tier volumes who need residency and thirty-day history together.

    pros
    • +eu data residency stated on the pricing page at no extra cost
    • +30-day retention on the scale tier
    • +dedicated ip included from foundation at 100k volume
    • +inbound routing on every tier including free
    cons
    • one day of log retention on the basic plan
    • $90 at 100k — near the top of the field
    • email validation is a separate paid add-on
    • overage on basic is $1.80 per thousand
  7. 7

    SendGrid

    #8 in transactional email providers · the default answer for a decade, now without a free plan, with three days of history, and behind a redirect loop.

    68/100

    verdictstill capable at the top tiers, and the entry experience has gone backwards — no free plan, three days of logs, and a pricing page that redirects in circles.

    SendGrid vs Amazon SES
     Amazon SESSendGrid
    price$1.60/mo$19.95/mo
    free tiernono
    10k emails$1.60/mo$19.95/mo
    100k emails$16/mo$89.95 (pro)
    free tiernone (aws credits only)60-day trial only
    log retentionnot documented3 days, 7 on pro
    eu regionyes, by regionpro and premier

    switch forhigh-volume senders on pro or premier who need a dedicated ip and eu residency bundled.

    pros
    • +dedicated ip and eu residency bundled on pro and premier
    • +proven infrastructure at very large scale
    • +overage falls to $0.0005 per email at the top tiers
    cons
    • permanent free plan removed in may 2025
    • three days of log retention on free and essentials
    • essentials 100k price not printed anywhere reachable
    • pricing urls redirect, sometimes in loops
  8. 8

    Loops

    #9 in transactional email providers · unlimited sends for a flat per-contact price — a different product that keeps appearing in the same comparisons.

    66/100

    verdictgenuinely good economics if your contact list is small and your send volume is high — and it cannot be compared to anything else on this page on price.

    Loops vs Amazon SES
     Amazon SESLoops
    price$1.60/mocontact-based
    free tiernoyes
    10k emails$1.60/mon/a — per contact
    100k emails$16/mon/a — per contact
    free tiernone (aws credits only)1,000 contacts
    log retentionnot documentednot documented
    eu regionyes, by regionnot documented

    switch forproduct teams sending both lifecycle marketing and transactional mail to a stable, known contact list.

    pros
    • +unlimited sends on paid plans, transactional included free
    • +one product for lifecycle and transactional mail
    • +free tier of 1,000 contacts and 4,000 sends
    cons
    • priced per contact — not comparable to per-send vendors
    • paid tier prices sit behind an unreadable slider
    • no dedicated ip, eu residency or retention information
    • poor fit if you email many addresses infrequently
  9. 9

    Mailjet

    #10 in transactional email providers · a cheap way in and a locked door at scale — everything above fifteen thousand emails sits behind a slider.

    62/100

    verdictgenuinely good value at the bottom — 6,000 emails free, 8,000 for $9 — and unrankable above that, because mailjet won't print the numbers.

    Mailjet vs Amazon SES
     Amazon SESMailjet
    price$1.60/mo$9/mo
    free tiernoyes
    10k emails$1.60/mo$17 (15k tier)
    100k emails$16/mohidden behind slider
    free tiernone (aws credits only)6,000/mo
    log retentionnot documentedundocumented (404)
    eu regionyes, by regionimplied, not stated

    switch forlow-volume senders who will stay under fifteen thousand emails a month.

    pros
    • +6,000 emails a month free — the most generous free tier here
    • +8,000 emails for $9, cheapest genuine entry point
    • +transactional and marketing share one plan quota
    cons
    • no printed pricing above 15,000 emails a month
    • log retention documentation returns 404
    • eu residency inferred from vat notices, not stated
    • dedicated ip gated at an unpriced 100k tier

how these were compared

every tool on this page went through the same test as Amazon SES — same tasks, same order, scored the same way. the comparison tables are the figures from that testing, not vendor spec sheets.

the transactional email providers test in full →
was this useful?