home / rankings / ai meeting notetakers / avoma alternatives Avoma alternatives 13 tools we tested head to head against Avoma, ranked — and what each one actually does differently.
last reviewed 29 jul 2026 · from our best 14 ai meeting notetakers · list curated by Onur Ozcan x in
first — what you'd be leaving Avoma ranks #11 of 14 in our ai meeting notetakers testing. captures phone calls as well as video, with a no-training promise that covers only google's data..
64 /100 the most complete sales-intelligence layer here, and its training carve-out protects google's data rather than yours.
why people look for an alternative
− no-training clause covers only google workspace data − no opt-out control mentioned for other recordings − us-only hosting, no eu option − add-ons cost nearly as much as the base seat stay with Avoma if captures dialer calls as well as video meetings is the thing you care about most — nothing below beats it on that.
advertisement
1
Fireflies.ai #1 in ai meeting notetakers · zero-day retention and a flat refusal to train on your meetings — both documented, in two places.
88 /100 verdict the only tool here that answers both hard questions with an unqualified no, and puts it in writing twice.
Fireflies.ai vs Avoma
Avoma Fireflies.ai price $19/user/mo $10/user/mo free tier no yes capture not documented not documented trains on you only workspace data excluded no — blanket commitment retention unquantified zero-day for meeting content eu hosting no enterprise storage choice price/user/mo $19-39 plus add-ons $10-39
switch for anyone recording conversations that belong to clients, patients or colleagues rather than to them.
pros
+ zero-day retention documented on two separate pages + blanket no-training commitment, not an opt-out + hipaa baa available on enterprise + 10+ platforms and 100+ languages cons
− doesn't state whether its recorder is visible in meetings − no consent mechanism for other participants − enterprise 'private storage' isn't full self-hosting − eu residency only via the enterprise storage option 2
Bluedot #2 in ai meeting notetakers · no bot, no calendar access, and a plain statement that your data never trains anything.
85 /100 verdict the cleanest combination of no-bot capture and an unscoped no-training promise — with the least said about where anything is stored.
Bluedot vs Avoma
Avoma Bluedot price $19/user/mo $14/user/mo free tier no yes capture not documented on-device, no bot trains on you only workspace data excluded no — unscoped retention unquantified not specified eu hosting no not committed price/user/mo $19-39 plus add-ons $14-32
switch for people who want notes without a bot appearing in the participant list.
pros
+ no bot and no calendar access required + unscoped no-training commitment + covers in-person meetings and any platform + only bills users who record cons
− no stated data-residency commitment − retention is a vague four-year contract clause − no signal to other participants that it's running − free tier is 5 meetings lifetime, not monthly 3
Granola #3 in ai meeting notetakers · never keeps the raw audio and never joins the call — and trains on you by default unless you're enterprise.
83 /100 verdict the best data-minimisation story here — the audio is discarded the moment it's transcribed — undercut by a training default that favours granola on every tier but the most expensive.
Granola vs Avoma
Avoma Granola price $19/user/mo $14/user/mo free tier no yes capture not documented on-device, no bot trains on you only workspace data excluded yes by default, opt-out retention unquantified no raw audio kept eu hosting no no price/user/mo $19-39 plus add-ons $14-35
switch for individuals who want frictionless capture and will go into settings to switch training off.
pros
+ raw audio discarded immediately after transcription + on-device capture with no bot in the meeting + third parties contractually barred from training on your data + training opt-out available on every tier including free cons
− granola's own training is on by default below enterprise − us-only hosting with no eu option − no monthly-versus-annual billing choice − no participant signal that it's recording advertisement
4
Read AI #4 in ai meeting notetakers · the only one that lets the other people in the meeting opt out of being recorded.
80 /100 verdict alone in this ranking in giving non-hosts a way out — which also means it's collecting on everyone who doesn't take it.
Read AI vs Avoma
Avoma Read AI price $19/user/mo $15/user/mo free tier no yes capture not documented in-call presence with notice trains on you only workspace data excluded personalised improvement permitted retention unquantified up to 2 years eu hosting no no guarantee price/user/mo $19-39 plus add-ons $15-39.75
switch for teams recording external meetings where participants should be able to decline.
pros
+ in-meeting opt-out for participants, unique here + notifies attendees that the meeting is being measured + clear per-tier pricing with a 25% annual discount + covers zoom, meet and teams on the free plan cons
− collection is on by default — participants must act − opt-out fails where meeting chat is disabled − two-year retention unless you buy enterprise+ − security page returns 404; certifications unverified 5
Spinach #5 in ai meeting notetakers · hipaa-ready with an unscoped no-training promise, and a privacy policy that won't load.
77 /100 verdict unusually strong compliance for the price and an unqualified no on training — with the pages that should back it up returning 404.
Spinach vs Avoma
Avoma Spinach price $19/user/mo $19/user/mo free tier no yes capture not documented not documented trains on you only workspace data excluded no — unscoped retention unquantified custom, paid add-on only eu hosting no not stated price/user/mo $19-39 plus add-ons $19-29
switch for engineering and agile teams wanting standup notes wired into jira or linear.
pros
+ unscoped no-training commitment on the security page + soc 2 type 2 audited by ey, plus hipaa and baas + free tier with unlimited recording and transcription + deep engineering and project-tool integrations cons
− privacy policy pages return 404 − capture method and consent handling undocumented − no default retention period disclosed − subprocessor zero-retention is not the same as spinach's own 6
Sembly AI #6 in ai meeting notetakers · eu data residency without paying enterprise prices — and training that's on by default until you do.
75 /100 verdict the only vendor here offering eu storage as a standard option rather than an enterprise upsell — attached to a training default that runs the other way.
Sembly AI vs Avoma
Avoma Sembly AI price $19/user/mo $10/user/mo free tier no yes capture not documented not documented trains on you only workspace data excluded yes below enterprise, opt-out retention unquantified user-configurable, 14-day backups eu hosting no yes, standard option price/user/mo $19-39 plus add-ons $10-39
switch for european teams who need data kept in the eea without an enterprise contract.
pros
+ eu data residency available on standard plans + configurable auto-delete rules for meeting content + cheapest entry tier here at $10 a seat annually + covers meet, teams, zoom and webex cons
− trains on your data by default below enterprise − capture method undocumented — how-it-works page 404s − no consent mechanism for other participants − deleted content persists in backups for 14 days 7
MeetGeek #7 in ai meeting notetakers · publishes exactly how long it keeps your audio and transcripts, per tier — and alerts participants when it starts.
73 /100 verdict the clearest retention disclosure in the category and an in-meeting alert — with no actual statement about model training.
MeetGeek vs Avoma
Avoma MeetGeek price $19/user/mo $9.99/user/mo free tier no yes capture not documented in-call, alerts participants trains on you only workspace data excluded not addressed retention unquantified 1 month to unlimited, by tier eu hosting no ireland only price/user/mo $19-39 plus add-ons $9.99-17
switch for teams that need to know precisely how long recordings live before choosing a plan.
pros
+ exact retention windows published per tier and data type + alerts participants when recording starts + ireland hosting for eu data + cheapest paid tier in this ranking at $9.99 cons
− no clause addressing model training at all − access-limitation language is not a no-training guarantee − consent explicitly pushed onto the user − ireland-only hosting with no regional choice 8
Grain #8 in ai meeting notetakers · no-bot capture that leans on zoom's own consent disclosures — and says nothing at all about training.
70 /100 verdict a smart approach to consent — reuse the platform's own — paired with a complete silence on whether it trains on your calls.
Grain vs Avoma
Avoma Grain price $19/user/mo $19/seat/mo free tier no yes capture not documented on-device, no bot trains on you only workspace data excluded not addressed retention unquantified not published eu hosting no no price/user/mo $19-39 plus add-ons $19 starter
switch for sales teams on zoom who want native recording disclosures rather than a separate consent layer.
pros
+ no-bot desktop capture with a recording disclaimer + uses zoom's native consent disclosure and reporting + free viewer seats for non-recording team members + soc 2 type ii on aws infrastructure cons
− no statement anywhere about model training − no published retention window − us-only hosting with no eu option − free plan capped at 20 meetings total 9
Jamie #9 in ai meeting notetakers · eu-hosted and covers in-person meetings — with a no-training clause narrower than it first reads.
68 /100 verdict a credible eu-first option with the broadest capture claim here — read its training clause twice, because the context narrows it.
Jamie vs Avoma
Avoma Jamie price $19/user/mo €21/user/mo free tier no yes capture not documented not documented trains on you only workspace data excluded no, but scoped to workspace retention unquantified no company default eu hosting no yes, partial containment price/user/mo $19-39 plus add-ons €21-39
switch for european teams recording a mix of video calls and in-person meetings.
pros
+ eu hosting with eea-based ai processing + covers in-person meetings as well as all online platforms + mcp support for querying meetings from ai tools + free tier of 10 meetings a month cons
− no-training clause is scoped to google workspace data − other subprocessors still process in the us − no company-wide retention default − priced in euros — normalise before comparing 10
Fathom #10 in ai meeting notetakers · the only vendor that warns you some jurisdictions require everyone's consent, not just yours.
66 /100 verdict unusually honest about the legal problem it creates for you, and unusually quiet about its own security posture.
Fathom vs Avoma
Avoma Fathom price $19/user/mo $15/user/mo free tier no yes capture not documented bot implied, not confirmed trains on you only workspace data excluded yes by default, opt-out retention unquantified unspecified, custom on enterprise eu hosting no no — us with sccs price/user/mo $19-39 plus add-ons $15-34
switch for teams who want unlimited free recording and will handle consent themselves.
pros
+ explicitly warns about all-party-consent jurisdictions + unlimited free recordings and transcriptions + third parties barred from training on your data + training opt-out available in account settings cons
− fathom trains on your data by default − security and compliance page returns 404 − retention is 'as long as necessary' below enterprise − domain migrated from fathom.video — old links stale + 3 more tested, not detailed here
we ranked 14 ai meeting notetakers in total. the 3 that didn't make this page are written up in the full ranking →
how these were compared every tool on this page went through the same test as Avoma — same tasks, same order, scored the same way. the comparison tables are the figures from that testing, not vendor spec sheets.
the ai meeting notetakers test in full → was this useful?
yes · 0 no · 0
Fireflies.ai alternatives Bluedot alternatives Granola alternatives Read AI alternatives Spinach alternatives Sembly AI alternatives