verifier.org

Deepgram alternatives

8 tools we tested head to head against Deepgram, ranked — and what each one actually does differently.

last reviewed 29 jul 2026 · from our best 9 speech-to-text apis ·list curated by Onur Ozcanxin

first — what you'd be leaving

Deepgram ranks #6 of 9 in our speech-to-text apis testing. the clearest pricing table here, for a price that assumes your recordings become their training data..

76/100

excellent, itemised, honest-looking pricing — with the most important term about it disclosed in an api parameter rather than on the pricing page.

why people look for an alternative
  • headline price assumes you let deepgram train on your audio
  • opting out roughly doubles the effective cost
  • diarization costs an extra $0.12/hr
  • around 30 languages, fewer than rivals

stay with Deepgram if lowest published real-time rate at $0.288/hr is the thing you care about most — nothing below beats it on that.

the short version
best alternativeGladiaanyone processing audio they don't own — customer calls, interviews, medical or legal recordings.88/100
advertisement
  1. 1

    Gladia

    #1 in speech-to-text apis · the only vendor here that makes not training on your audio the contractual default, with diarization thrown in free.

    88/100

    verdictthe most expensive entry rate here and the only data policy you don't have to negotiate for — which for most regulated work settles it.

    Gladia vs Deepgram
     DeepgramGladia
    price$0.462/hr$0.61/hr
    free tieryesyes
    cost/hr batch$0.462$0.61
    cost/hr realtime$0.288$0.75
    diarization+$0.12/hrincluded free
    trains on your audioyes — price depends on itno, by default
    self-hostsales-gatedenterprise only

    switch foranyone processing audio they don't own — customer calls, interviews, medical or legal recordings.

    pros
    • +no training on your audio, contractually, by default
    • +diarization included free at every tier
    • +100+ languages with mid-sentence switching
    • +one-time €50 credit with no monthly reset
    cons
    • $0.61/hr pay-as-you-go is the highest entry rate here
    • the advertised $0.20/hr needs a volume commitment
    • on-premise listed but detailed only via sales
    • word error rate is self-reported with no named dataset
  2. 2

    AssemblyAI

    #2 in speech-to-text apis · cheapest managed batch transcription, quoted in the right unit — with streaming billed by the clock, not the audio.

    86/100

    verdictthe best price-to-capability ratio here and the only vendor already quoting in dollars per hour — spoiled by a streaming meter that runs on silence.

    AssemblyAI vs Deepgram
     DeepgramAssemblyAI
    price$0.462/hr$0.15/hr
    free tieryesyes
    cost/hr batch$0.462$0.15-0.21
    cost/hr realtime$0.288$0.45 base
    diarization+$0.12/hr+$0.02 to $0.12/hr
    trains on your audioyes — price depends on ityes, opt-out available
    self-hostsales-gatednot offered

    switch forhigh-volume batch transcription where cost per hour is the deciding number.

    pros
    • +cheapest managed batch rate at $0.15/hr
    • +already quotes in dollars per hour
    • +99+ languages on streaming
    • +$50 free credit with no card required
    cons
    • streaming billed by socket-open time, not audio
    • trains on your data by default; opt-out is manual
    • diarization costs extra in every mode
    • no self-hosting option at all
  3. 3

    ElevenLabs Scribe

    #3 in speech-to-text apis · top of the independent accuracy leaderboard at $0.22 an hour — or nine times that if you pay the wrong way.

    85/100

    verdictthe most accurate option here by an independent measure, at a genuinely low rate, sitting behind a billing choice that can cost you nine times more for identical output.

    ElevenLabs Scribe vs Deepgram
     DeepgramElevenLabs Scribe
    price$0.462/hr$0.22/hr
    free tieryesyes
    cost/hr batch$0.462$0.22 payg
    cost/hr realtime$0.288not separately published
    diarization+$0.12/hrincluded, 32 speakers
    trains on your audioyes — price depends on itnot published
    self-hostsales-gatednot offered

    switch foraccuracy-critical transcription with lots of speakers — provided you set up billing correctly.

    pros
    • +1.5% word error rate, first on an independent leaderboard
    • +$0.22/hr on pay-as-you-go
    • +diarization for up to 32 speakers
    • +audio-event tagging alongside transcription
    cons
    • subscription credits cost roughly 9x the payg rate
    • training policy for scribe audio not published clearly
    • no self-hosting option
    • free tier is about 30 minutes a month
    advertisement
  4. 4

    OpenAI Whisper API

    #4 in speech-to-text apis · the only entry whose model you can legally run yourself for free — which makes it the yardstick for everything else here.

    84/100

    verdictnot the most accurate and not the cheapest, but the only one where the managed price and the self-hosted price are the same model — and it doesn't train on your audio.

    OpenAI Whisper API vs Deepgram
     DeepgramOpenAI Whisper API
    price$0.462/hr$0.18/hr
    free tieryesno
    cost/hr batch$0.462$0.18-0.36
    cost/hr realtime$0.288not published
    diarization+$0.12/hrnone native
    trains on your audioyes — price depends on itno, by default
    self-hostsales-gatedyes, mit weights

    switch forteams who want a managed option today and the ability to walk away to their own hardware later.

    pros
    • +mit weights, free to self-host, same model as the api
    • +no training on your audio by default
    • +gpt-4o-mini-transcribe at $0.18/hr
    • +99 languages
    cons
    • no native speaker diarization
    • no free tier or trial credit
    • no separately published real-time rate
    • whisper large-v3 no longer leads open leaderboards
  5. 5

    Rev AI

    #5 in speech-to-text apis · ten cents an hour — the cheapest number in this ranking, attached to the least complete pricing page.

    80/100

    verdictless than half assemblyai's rate and a third of whisper's, with real-time pricing and diarization costs that simply aren't published.

    Rev AI vs Deepgram
     DeepgramRev AI
    price$0.462/hr$0.10/hr
    free tieryesyes
    cost/hr batch$0.462$0.10-0.30
    cost/hr realtime$0.288not published
    diarization+$0.12/hrclaimed, billing unclear
    trains on your audioyes — price depends on itnot published
    self-hostsales-gatedclaimed, unverified

    switch forlarge batch archives where price per hour dominates and English is the main language.

    pros
    • +$0.10/hr — cheapest published rate here
    • +free credits worth five hours of transcription
    • +claimed open-source model lineage
    • +57+ languages for async transcription
    cons
    • no published real-time or streaming rate
    • diarization billing unclear
    • streaming supports only 9+ languages
    • open-source claim unverified — licence not confirmed
  6. 6

    Speechmatics

    #7 in speech-to-text apis · built for regulated on-premise deployment, with a pricing page that won't separate batch from real-time.

    70/100

    verdicta serious enterprise product whose self-serve pricing tells you less than any pure-play rival's — which matters less if you were always going to talk to sales.

    Speechmatics vs Deepgram
     DeepgramSpeechmatics
    price$0.462/hr$0.129/hr
    free tieryesyes
    cost/hr batch$0.462from $0.129
    cost/hr realtime$0.288~$0.24, unconfirmed
    diarization+$0.12/hrlikely included, unconfirmed
    trains on your audioyes — price depends on ittoggle, default unknown
    self-hostsales-gatedyes, sales-gated

    switch forregulated enterprises that need on-premise or on-device deployment and will go through sales anyway.

    pros
    • +saas, on-premises and on-device deployment
    • +$100 free credit, no card required
    • +per-second billing with automatic volume discounts
    • +56+ languages
    cons
    • pricing page doesn't separate batch from real-time
    • accuracy documentation returns 404
    • default training setting unconfirmed
    • on-premise licensing requires sales
  7. 7

    Azure AI Speech

    #8 in speech-to-text apis · genuinely offline containers for air-gapped work, and a price even microsoft's own channels can't agree on.

    64/100

    verdictthe best offline story in the category attached to the worst price transparency — you cannot find out what it costs without a sales conversation or a calculator session.

    Azure AI Speech vs Deepgram
     DeepgramAzure AI Speech
    price$0.462/hrunverified
    free tieryesyes
    cost/hr batch$0.462not readable
    cost/hr realtime$0.288not readable
    diarization+$0.12/hrfree on batch, paid on realtime
    trains on your audioyes — price depends on itno, per azure policy
    self-hostsales-gatedyes, offline containers

    switch forair-gapped and regulated deployments where the disconnected container is the requirement.

    pros
    • +fully offline disconnected containers for air-gapped use
    • +batch diarization included at no extra charge
    • +free tier of five audio hours a month
    • +azure's enterprise compliance and support
    cons
    • no static price figure obtainable at all
    • microsoft's own sources give conflicting rates
    • batch not supported on the free tier
    • real-time diarization is a paid add-on
  8. 8

    Google Cloud Speech-to-Text

    #9 in speech-to-text apis · chirp 3 behind a pricing page that is a calculator, with no number on it anywhere.

    60/100

    verdictcapable models and a real on-premise product line, sold from the least readable pricing page of the nine — we cannot tell you what it costs.

    Google Cloud Speech-to-Text vs Deepgram
     DeepgramGoogle Cloud Speech-to-Text
    price$0.462/hrunverified
    free tieryesyes
    cost/hr batch$0.462not readable
    cost/hr realtime$0.288not readable
    diarization+$0.12/hravailable, pricing unclear
    trains on your audioyes — price depends on itno, per gcp policy
    self-hostsales-gatedseparate on-prem product

    switch forteams already committed to google cloud, who will price it inside the console.

    pros
    • +chirp 2 and chirp 3 models with broad language coverage
    • +billing now rounds to the second, not 15 seconds
    • +dedicated on-premise product line
    • +deepest integration for existing gcp users
    cons
    • no price figure extractable from its own page
    • free-tier allowance unconfirmed on google's pages
    • no published headline accuracy figure
    • diarization surcharge status unclear

how these were compared

every tool on this page went through the same test as Deepgram — same tasks, same order, scored the same way. the comparison tables are the figures from that testing, not vendor spec sheets.

the speech-to-text apis test in full →
was this useful?