home / rankings / employee monitoring tools / hubstaff alternatives Hubstaff alternatives 12 tools we tested head to head against Hubstaff, ranked — and what each one actually does differently.
last reviewed 4 aug 2026 · from our best 13 employee monitoring tools · list curated by Onur Ozcan x in
first — what you'd be leaving Hubstaff ranks #2 of 13 in our employee monitoring tools testing. no keystroke logging, no email monitoring, no camera access — and screenshots you can blur or turn off..
79 /100 the same restraint as activtrak with better screenshot controls, on a pricing page we could not read.
why people look for an alternative
− no price verifiable from the vendor's own page − compliance responsibility handed entirely to the employer − no on-premise option − data residency not specified anywhere stay with Hubstaff if explicitly no keystroke logging, email monitoring or camera access is the thing you care about most — nothing below beats it on that.
advertisement
1
ActivTrak #1 in employee monitoring tools · publishes a list of what it refuses to do — no keystrokes, no camera, no email, no personal devices.
84 /100 verdict the clearest published limits in the category, at a price you can read without asking anyone.
ActivTrak vs Hubstaff
Hubstaff ActivTrak price not verifiable $10/worker/month free tier no yes stealth mode none — explicitly not offered none — explicitly not offered keystroke logging explicitly not offered explicitly not offered price per user/month unverified — js-rendered page $10 / $15 / $17, annual on-premise no — cloud only no — cloud only minimum seats unverified none; free plan capped at 3
switch for companies that want workforce analytics and want to be able to show employees exactly where the line is.
pros
+ publishes an explicit list of capabilities it declines + no stealth or hidden-agent option at all + published per-seat pricing at $10/$15/$17 + free plan for up to 3 workers cons
− screenshot defaults and controls could not be verified — pages 404'd − no consent or notification workflow documented − annual billing only, no monthly option − free accounts deleted after 30 days of inactivity 2
DeskTime #3 in employee monitoring tools · markets its own lack of a hidden mode as the reason to buy it, and lets employees pause tracking themselves.
76 /100 verdict the only vendor here that gives the monitored person a control of their own, at the cheapest verified price on the page.
DeskTime vs Hubstaff
Hubstaff DeskTime price not verifiable $6.42/user/month free tier no yes stealth mode none — explicitly not offered none — marketed as such keystroke logging explicitly not offered not mentioned; likely none price per user/month unverified — js-rendered page $6.42 pro / $9.17 premium on-premise no — cloud only no — cloud only minimum seats unverified none; enterprise 200+
switch for teams that want tracking both sides can see, with an employee-controlled off switch.
pros
+ markets the absence of stealth mode as a differentiator + employees can pause tracking with private time + data visible to employees as well as managers + $6.42/user/month published, same rate monthly or annual cons
− keystroke logging neither offered nor explicitly refused − screenshot default frequency undocumented − nothing published on consent, residency or legal framework − no on-premise option; enterprise needs 200+ users 3
Insightful #4 in employee monitoring tools · documents a hidden mode and then tells you not to use it.
74 /100 verdict the only vendor whose own documentation recommends against its covert mode — and it has a real on-prem option.
Insightful vs Hubstaff
Hubstaff Insightful price not verifiable $8/seat/month free tier no no stealth mode none — explicitly not offered yes — documented, vendor advises against keystroke logging explicitly not offered unverified price per user/month unverified — js-rendered page $8 / $12 / $16, annual on-premise no — cloud only yes — 250 licence minimum minimum seats unverified none cloud; 250 on-prem
switch for companies that want a stealth capability available but want the vendor's own guidance pushing them away from it.
pros
+ vendor guidance recommends visible mode regardless of employee status + granular documented toggle between hidden and visible + genuine on-premise deployment of the full platform + published pricing at $8/$12/$16 per seat cons
− on-premise gated behind a 250-licence minimum − stealth marketing page unreachable — behaviour found via knowledge base − screenshot, keystroke and webcam behaviour unverified − no consent or notification workflow documented advertisement
4
Controlio #5 in employee monitoring tools · a completely invisible agent and a gdpr mode, sold side by side at $6.67 a seat.
71 /100 verdict the cheapest verified price here and the most candid stealth description — with keystroke logging and no consent workflow attached.
Controlio vs Hubstaff
Hubstaff Controlio price not verifiable $6.67/user/month free tier no no stealth mode none — explicitly not offered yes — invisible, absent from task manager keystroke logging explicitly not offered yes price per user/month unverified — js-rendered page $6.67 basic / $9.99 advanced on-premise no — cloud only yes — from 10 users minimum seats unverified 5
switch for buyers who want covert capability with an explicit compliance toggle and an on-prem option at small scale.
pros
+ states the agent is invisible in plain language — no ambiguity + $6.67/user/month annually, the cheapest verified rate here + on-premise available from 10 users; private cloud on request + explicit gdpr mode for eu deployments cons
− fully hidden agent with no visible-mode alternative documented − keystroke logging included − no consent or notification workflow despite the gdpr-mode claim − webcam and message-content capture undocumented 5
Time Doctor #6 in employee monitoring tools · a silent app with no interface that the employee cannot pause — not marketed as covert, functionally invisible.
69 /100 verdict sits in the category's grey zone — silent by design, never described as hidden, and priced where we cannot see it.
Time Doctor vs Hubstaff
Hubstaff Time Doctor price not verifiable not verifiable free tier no no stealth mode none — explicitly not offered silent app — no ui, cannot be paused keystroke logging explicitly not offered not addressed price per user/month unverified — js-rendered page unverified — js-rendered page on-premise no — cloud only private cloud on enterprise minimum seats unverified none stated
switch for dedicated work devices where a persistent tracking ui would be a nuisance rather than a disclosure.
pros
+ documents both silent and interactive deployment options clearly + documents the macos permission limit on silent installs + private cloud deployment on the enterprise plan + 14-day trial with full premium access and no card cons
− no price figures obtainable from the vendor's own page − silent app cannot be paused by the user − no notice or consent mechanism despite privacy-first marketing − screenshot, keystroke and webcam defaults all undocumented 6
Prodoscore #7 in employee monitoring tools · no agent on most integrations, no screenshots, no keylogging — it scores activity from business apps instead.
66 /100 verdict a structurally different product that avoids the category's whole legal problem, at the highest per-seat price here.
Prodoscore vs Hubstaff
Hubstaff Prodoscore price not verifiable $19.99/user/month free tier no no stealth mode none — explicitly not offered n/a — no agent on most integrations keystroke logging explicitly not offered explicitly not offered price per user/month unverified — js-rendered page $19.99 on-premise no — cloud only no — google cloud only minimum seats unverified 15
switch for leadership teams wanting productivity signal from tools people already use, with no endpoint agent.
pros
+ no endpoint agent on most integrations + explicitly no screenshots and no keylogging + signal drawn from platforms the employer already controls + published price at $19.99 per user cons
− highest per-seat price here with a $300/month floor − 15-seat minimum rules out small teams − whether message content is read is not confirmable − no on-premise option and no disclosed data residency 7
Teramind #8 in employee monitoring tools · advertises software that operates hidden from task manager and resists removal, then tells you to be transparent about it.
63 /100 verdict the most complete covert capability in the category, documented in detail and priced nowhere.
Teramind vs Hubstaff
Hubstaff Teramind price not verifiable quoted free tier no no stealth mode none — explicitly not offered yes — hidden from task manager, tamper-proof keystroke logging explicitly not offered yes — default-on, admin can disable price per user/month unverified — js-rendered page quoted — not published on-premise no — cloud only historically yes — unverified this pass minimum seats unverified unverified
switch for insider-risk and dlp programmes with legal counsel already engaged on the monitoring question.
pros
+ the most thoroughly documented stealth capability in the category + admin-toggleable between hidden and revealed agents + dlp across usb, cloud, email attachments and web uploads + faq acknowledges the consent obligation explicitly cons
− no public pricing on any tier − keystroke logging appears to be on by default − tamper-proof install explicitly resists removal by users − transparency guidance is advisory only — nothing is enforced 8
Veriato #9 in employee monitoring tools · stealth is not a setting you enable — it is how the agent ships, with filenames chosen to avoid antivirus detection.
60 /100 verdict the only product here where an unconfigured install is already invisible, and it evades security software by design.
Veriato vs Hubstaff
Hubstaff Veriato price not verifiable $18/user/month free tier no no stealth mode none — explicitly not offered yes — on by default, anti-av filenames keystroke logging explicitly not offered historically yes — unverified this pass price per user/month unverified — js-rendered page $18, annual on-premise no — cloud only yes minimum seats unverified 5 uam / 20 irm
switch for insider-threat investigations where covert operation is the explicit, counselled objective.
pros
+ publishes a per-seat price at $18, unlike most stealth vendors + cloud or on-premise deployment both offered + volume discounts below $18 at higher user counts + documents its own default behaviour candidly cons
− stealth is the default state, not an opt-in − fixed filenames chosen to evade antivirus detection − product pages beyond pricing largely 404'd — capture behaviour unverified − no consent, notification or data-residency information available 9
KeepActive #10 in employee monitoring tools · hides the agent from the process list and times its uploads so nothing looks suspicious — renamed from Kickidler in 2025.
57 /100 verdict one of the few genuinely air-gapped options here, mid-rebrand, with no price you can see.
KeepActive vs Hubstaff
Hubstaff KeepActive price not verifiable quoted free tier no yes stealth mode none — explicitly not offered yes — hidden from process list keystroke logging explicitly not offered yes price per user/month unverified — js-rendered page quoted — not published on-premise no — cloud only yes — including offline local version minimum seats unverified none — from 1 licence
switch for sites needing a fully offline, no-internet deployment with covert capability.
pros
+ documented hidden mode, absent from the process list + upload pattern designed to avoid looking anomalous + on-premise plus a fully offline no-internet version + no seat minimum — licences from 1 cons
− no published pricing at any tier − mid-rebrand, trading under two names simultaneously − keystroke logging and video recording both retained − nothing published on consent, legal framework or residency 10
Monitask #11 in employee monitoring tools · sells stealth mode on one part of its site and says screenshots need the user's permission on another.
54 /100 verdict cheap, and the only vendor here contradicting itself on both price and consent on a single page.
Monitask vs Hubstaff
Hubstaff Monitask price not verifiable $6.49/user/month free tier no no stealth mode none — explicitly not offered listed as a feature — contradicted by own faq keystroke logging explicitly not offered not mentioned price per user/month unverified — js-rendered page $6.49 / $8.99 / $12.99 — disputed on-premise no — cloud only no — cloud only minimum seats unverified none; enterprise 100+
switch for small teams on a budget who are prepared to get both the price and the consent behaviour confirmed in writing first.
pros
+ cheapest published entry price among stealth-capable vendors + faq states screenshot auto-start requires user permission + 256-bit aes encryption on stored screenshot and time data + 10-day free trial with no card required cons
− two different price sets published on the same page − stealth mode feature contradicts the faq's permission claim − no on-premise option − keystroke, webcam and message capture all undocumented + 2 more tested, not detailed here
we ranked 13 employee monitoring tools in total. the 2 that didn't make this page are written up in the full ranking →
how these were compared every tool on this page went through the same test as Hubstaff — same tasks, same order, scored the same way. the comparison tables are the figures from that testing, not vendor spec sheets.
the employee monitoring tools test in full → was this useful?
yes · 0 no · 0
ActivTrak alternatives DeskTime alternatives Insightful alternatives Controlio alternatives Time Doctor alternatives Prodoscore alternatives