Riff (formerly Databutton) ranks #12 of 16 in our ai app builders testing. python-backed app building, now aimed at the enterprise.
64/100
a capable react + python builder with a real backend, now repositioned for enterprise governance after rebranding from databutton — solid technically, but pricing is a moving target we couldn't verify.
why people look for an alternative
−current pricing unverified post-rebrand
−product in transition after the pivot
−no longer aimed at solo builders
stay with Riff (formerly Databutton) if react + python (fastapi) backend depth is the thing you care about most — nothing below beats it on that.
#1 in ai app builders · the market leader, with a real exit path off the platform
90/100
verdictthe best all-round balance of output quality, a real backend, and a genuine way out — two-way github sync plus the ability to migrate onto your own supabase. credit burn on heavy iteration is the tax.
Lovable vs Riff (formerly Databutton)
Riff (formerly Databutton)
Lovable
price
not confirmed post-rebrand
$25/mo (Pro)
free tier
no
yes
builds
full-stack web apps
full-stack web apps
output stack
react + python (fastapi)
react/tailwind/vite + supabase
code export
verify current path
two-way github + zip
backend
neon postgres + auth
supabase (provisioned)
pricing model
credits (unconfirmed)
credits
switch forfounders and developers building a serious mvp they may want to own later
pros
+two-way github sync plus a real migrate-to-your-own-supabase path
+full-stack: provisions auth, postgres and storage
+clear market and funding leader — low platform risk
cons
−credit burn on heavy iteration; per-action value opaque
−stack fairly fixed to react + supabase
−dollar pricing is javascript-gated on the live page
#2 in ai app builders · the developer's pick — real exportable code, flexible stack
89/100
verdictthe strongest ownership story with the most flexible output: it runs a real node toolchain in the browser, exports full code, syncs to github, and ships to netlify or vercel. token burn on big projects is the catch.
Bolt.new vs Riff (formerly Databutton)
Riff (formerly Databutton)
Bolt.new
price
not confirmed post-rebrand
$25/mo (Pro)
free tier
no
yes
builds
full-stack web apps
full-stack web apps
output stack
react + python (fastapi)
flexible (react/vite/next + supabase)
code export
verify current path
download + two-way github
backend
neon postgres + auth
supabase (your keys)
pricing model
credits (unconfirmed)
tokens (scale with codebase)
switch fordevelopers who want genuine ownership and a stack that isn't locked to one vendor
pros
+full code export plus two-way github sync
+flexible, real node stack (not one fixed template)
+native netlify/vercel/render publishing
cons
−tokens scale with codebase size — big apps get pricey
#3 in ai app builders · the best ui output, now a full-stack sandbox — on vercel's rails
86/100
verdictthe best-looking output in the category and, since early 2026, a real full-stack sandbox — but the iteration loop stays coupled to vercel and next, so you own the code less freely than with bolt.
v0 vs Riff (formerly Databutton)
Riff (formerly Databutton)
v0
price
not confirmed post-rebrand
$30/user/mo (Plus)
free tier
no
yes
builds
full-stack web apps
full-stack web apps
output stack
react + python (fastapi)
next.js + tailwind + shadcn/ui
code export
verify current path
export + github (loop stays on vercel)
backend
neon postgres + auth
supabase / neon / upstash
pricing model
credits (unconfirmed)
credits + token model pricing
switch fordevelopers who want top-tier ui and already live in the vercel/next ecosystem
pros
+best-in-class ui output quality
+now a full-stack sandbox, not just components
+tight supabase/neon/upstash integrations
cons
−iteration loop coupled to vercel and next.js
−less vendor-neutral ownership than bolt
−token-priced model usage on top of the seat price
#4 in ai app builders · a real cloud ide you own — with the category's scariest bill
83/100
verdictthe most 'real dev platform' of the bunch — a genuine cloud ide with hosting where you truly own the code — held back by effort-based billing that can run away from you with no cap.
Replit (Agent 3) vs Riff (formerly Databutton)
Riff (formerly Databutton)
Replit (Agent 3)
price
not confirmed post-rebrand
$20/mo (Core, billed annually)
free tier
no
yes
builds
full-stack web apps
full-stack web apps (+ more)
output stack
react + python (fastapi)
flexible (many languages)
code export
verify current path
yes — full ide, github
backend
neon postgres + auth
replit db / auth / storage
pricing model
credits (unconfirmed)
effort-based credits (no cap)
switch fordevelopers and tinkerers who want a full environment, not just a generator
pros
+a genuine full cloud ide, not just a prompt box
+you truly own and can export the code
+databases, auth, storage and hosting built in
cons
−effort-based billing has no estimate and no spend cap
−runaway-spend is the category's loudest complaint
#5 in ai app builders · a team of agents that ships web and mobile, and owns the code
81/100
verdicta fast-rising multi-agent builder that produces ownable react/next web apps and expo mobile apps, with real backend options — newer and less battle-tested than the leaders, but moving fast.
Emergent vs Riff (formerly Databutton)
Riff (formerly Databutton)
Emergent
price
not confirmed post-rebrand
$20/mo (Standard)
free tier
no
yes
builds
full-stack web apps
full-stack web + mobile
output stack
react + python (fastapi)
react/next + node/fastapi; expo
code export
verify current path
yes — ownable code
backend
neon postgres + auth
node / fastapi + integrations
pricing model
credits (unconfirmed)
credits
switch forfounders who want a fuller multi-agent build, including a mobile app
pros
+builds web and mobile, with ownable code
+multi-agent workflow with real backends (node/fastapi)
#6 in ai app builders · quietly the best value, with a full github repo per project
79/100
verdictthe underrated value pick: a yearly license plus wholesale pay-as-you-go credits, and a full unrestricted private github repo for every project. less polish and momentum than the leaders, but the ownership and price are excellent.
Softgen vs Riff (formerly Databutton)
Riff (formerly Databutton)
Softgen
price
not confirmed post-rebrand
~$33/yr + pay-as-you-go credits
free tier
no
no
builds
full-stack web apps
full-stack web apps
output stack
react + python (fastapi)
next.js/ts/shadcn + supabase/firebase
code export
verify current path
full private github repo
backend
neon postgres + auth
supabase or firebase
pricing model
credits (unconfirmed)
yearly license + pay-as-you-go
switch forbudget-conscious developers who want real ownership without a subscription
pros
+full unrestricted private github repo per project
+yearly license + wholesale pay-as-you-go, no subscription
+modern next.js/shadcn stack on supabase or firebase
cons
−smaller company, less polish and community
−no true free tier (small credit purchase to start)
#7 in ai app builders · polished, batteries-included — and now owned by wix
76/100
verdicta polished all-in-one with a built-in database, auth and integrations — great for non-technical builders, but more platform-bound than bolt or softgen, and pricier since the wix acquisition.
Base44 vs Riff (formerly Databutton)
Riff (formerly Databutton)
Base44
price
not confirmed post-rebrand
$16/mo (Starter, billed annually)
free tier
no
yes
builds
full-stack web apps
full-stack web apps
output stack
react + python (fastapi)
own all-in-one platform
code export
verify current path
platform-bound (verify)
backend
neon postgres + auth
built-in db + auth
pricing model
credits (unconfirmed)
dual credits (message + integration)
switch fornon-technical builders who want everything built in and don't need to leave the platform
#8 in ai app builders · planning-first: diagrams before code
73/100
verdicta yc-backed, planning-first builder that maps user flows and architecture before writing react — a disciplined approach that reduces slop, though it's smaller than the leaders and the assisted tier is enterprise-priced.
Tempo vs Riff (formerly Databutton)
Riff (formerly Databutton)
Tempo
price
not confirmed post-rebrand
$30/mo (Pro)
free tier
no
yes
builds
full-stack web apps
full-stack react apps
output stack
react + python (fastapi)
react (planning-first)
code export
verify current path
react code (verify path)
backend
neon postgres + auth
full-stack react (verify provider)
pricing model
credits (unconfirmed)
credits
switch forteams that want a disciplined design-then-build workflow rather than instant slop
#9 in ai app builders · cheap, honest token ladder — great for drafts and ui clones
71/100
verdictthe cleanest, cheapest token ladder in the category, with downloadable projects and a knack for cloning an existing ui from a url or screenshot — but a thinner backend story, so treat it as a drafting tool.
Same.new vs Riff (formerly Databutton)
Riff (formerly Databutton)
Same.new
price
not confirmed post-rebrand
$10/mo (Basic)
free tier
no
yes
builds
full-stack web apps
web app drafts + ui clones
output stack
react + python (fastapi)
react-family web
code export
verify current path
download on paid tiers
backend
neon postgres + auth
light
pricing model
credits (unconfirmed)
tokens (no rollover)
switch forsolo builders who want fast, cheap web drafts or to clone an existing ui
pros
+cleanest, cheapest token ladder in the category
+download and remix projects on paid tiers
+excellent at cloning a ui from a url/screenshot
cons
−thinner backend story than the leaders
−tokens don't roll over — they expire each cycle
−more draft/prototype tool than production platform
#10 in ai app builders · the best-known prompt-to-mobile-app builder
69/100
verdictthe best-known way to build a cross-platform mobile app from a prompt, now with a native-swift option — but mobile store submission still has real friction, and you should confirm the export path.
Rork vs Riff (formerly Databutton)
Riff (formerly Databutton)
Rork
price
not confirmed post-rebrand
$25/mo (Junior)
free tier
no
yes
builds
full-stack web apps
mobile apps (ios + android)
output stack
react + python (fastapi)
react native; native swift (max)
code export
verify current path
verify on live docs
backend
neon postgres + auth
external
pricing model
credits (unconfirmed)
credits
switch fornon-technical founders shipping a mobile app without touching xcode
pros
+best-known prompt-to-mobile builder
+cross-platform react native plus a native-swift option
every tool on this page went through the same test as Riff (formerly Databutton) — same tasks, same order, scored the same way. the comparison tables are the figures from that testing, not vendor spec sheets.