verifier.org

Same.new alternatives

15 tools we tested head to head against Same.new, ranked — and what each one actually does differently.

last reviewed 24 jul 2026 · from our best 16 ai app builders ·list curated by Onur Ozcanxin

first — what you'd be leaving

Same.new ranks #9 of 16 in our ai app builders testing. cheap, honest token ladder — great for drafts and ui clones.

71/100

the cleanest, cheapest token ladder in the category, with downloadable projects and a knack for cloning an existing ui from a url or screenshot — but a thinner backend story, so treat it as a drafting tool.

why people look for an alternative
  • thinner backend story than the leaders
  • tokens don't roll over — they expire each cycle
  • more draft/prototype tool than production platform

stay with Same.new if cleanest, cheapest token ladder in the category is the thing you care about most — nothing below beats it on that.

the short version
best alternativeLovablefounders and developers building a serious mvp they may want to own later90/100
advertisement
  1. 1

    Lovable

    #1 in ai app builders · the market leader, with a real exit path off the platform

    90/100

    verdictthe best all-round balance of output quality, a real backend, and a genuine way out — two-way github sync plus the ability to migrate onto your own supabase. credit burn on heavy iteration is the tax.

    Lovable vs Same.new
     Same.newLovable
    price$10/mo (Basic)$25/mo (Pro)
    free tieryesyes
    buildsweb app drafts + ui clonesfull-stack web apps
    output stackreact-family webreact/tailwind/vite + supabase
    code exportdownload on paid tierstwo-way github + zip
    backendlightsupabase (provisioned)
    pricing modeltokens (no rollover)credits

    switch forfounders and developers building a serious mvp they may want to own later

    pros
    • +two-way github sync plus a real migrate-to-your-own-supabase path
    • +full-stack: provisions auth, postgres and storage
    • +clear market and funding leader — low platform risk
    cons
    • credit burn on heavy iteration; per-action value opaque
    • stack fairly fixed to react + supabase
    • dollar pricing is javascript-gated on the live page
  2. 2

    Bolt.new

    #2 in ai app builders · the developer's pick — real exportable code, flexible stack

    89/100

    verdictthe strongest ownership story with the most flexible output: it runs a real node toolchain in the browser, exports full code, syncs to github, and ships to netlify or vercel. token burn on big projects is the catch.

    Bolt.new vs Same.new
     Same.newBolt.new
    price$10/mo (Basic)$25/mo (Pro)
    free tieryesyes
    buildsweb app drafts + ui clonesfull-stack web apps
    output stackreact-family webflexible (react/vite/next + supabase)
    code exportdownload on paid tiersdownload + two-way github
    backendlightsupabase (your keys)
    pricing modeltokens (no rollover)tokens (scale with codebase)

    switch fordevelopers who want genuine ownership and a stack that isn't locked to one vendor

    pros
    • +full code export plus two-way github sync
    • +flexible, real node stack (not one fixed template)
    • +native netlify/vercel/render publishing
    cons
    • tokens scale with codebase size — big apps get pricey
    • token burn is the top user complaint
    • tight daily cap on the free tier
  3. 3

    v0

    #3 in ai app builders · the best ui output, now a full-stack sandbox — on vercel's rails

    86/100

    verdictthe best-looking output in the category and, since early 2026, a real full-stack sandbox — but the iteration loop stays coupled to vercel and next, so you own the code less freely than with bolt.

    v0 vs Same.new
     Same.newv0
    price$10/mo (Basic)$30/user/mo (Plus)
    free tieryesyes
    buildsweb app drafts + ui clonesfull-stack web apps
    output stackreact-family webnext.js + tailwind + shadcn/ui
    code exportdownload on paid tiersexport + github (loop stays on vercel)
    backendlightsupabase / neon / upstash
    pricing modeltokens (no rollover)credits + token model pricing

    switch fordevelopers who want top-tier ui and already live in the vercel/next ecosystem

    pros
    • +best-in-class ui output quality
    • +now a full-stack sandbox, not just components
    • +tight supabase/neon/upstash integrations
    cons
    • iteration loop coupled to vercel and next.js
    • less vendor-neutral ownership than bolt
    • token-priced model usage on top of the seat price
    advertisement
  4. 4

    Replit (Agent 3)

    #4 in ai app builders · a real cloud ide you own — with the category's scariest bill

    83/100

    verdictthe most 'real dev platform' of the bunch — a genuine cloud ide with hosting where you truly own the code — held back by effort-based billing that can run away from you with no cap.

    Replit (Agent 3) vs Same.new
     Same.newReplit (Agent 3)
    price$10/mo (Basic)$20/mo (Core, billed annually)
    free tieryesyes
    buildsweb app drafts + ui clonesfull-stack web apps (+ more)
    output stackreact-family webflexible (many languages)
    code exportdownload on paid tiersyes — full ide, github
    backendlightreplit db / auth / storage
    pricing modeltokens (no rollover)effort-based credits (no cap)

    switch fordevelopers and tinkerers who want a full environment, not just a generator

    pros
    • +a genuine full cloud ide, not just a prompt box
    • +you truly own and can export the code
    • +databases, auth, storage and hosting built in
    cons
    • effort-based billing has no estimate and no spend cap
    • runaway-spend is the category's loudest complaint
    • pricing model has changed repeatedly
  5. 5

    Emergent

    #5 in ai app builders · a team of agents that ships web and mobile, and owns the code

    81/100

    verdicta fast-rising multi-agent builder that produces ownable react/next web apps and expo mobile apps, with real backend options — newer and less battle-tested than the leaders, but moving fast.

    Emergent vs Same.new
     Same.newEmergent
    price$10/mo (Basic)$20/mo (Standard)
    free tieryesyes
    buildsweb app drafts + ui clonesfull-stack web + mobile
    output stackreact-family webreact/next + node/fastapi; expo
    code exportdownload on paid tiersyes — ownable code
    backendlightnode / fastapi + integrations
    pricing modeltokens (no rollover)credits

    switch forfounders who want a fuller multi-agent build, including a mobile app

    pros
    • +builds web and mobile, with ownable code
    • +multi-agent workflow with real backends (node/fastapi)
    • +strong funding and momentum
    cons
    • newer and less battle-tested than the leaders
    • credit-to-work conversion is opaque
    • breadth means more surface area to go wrong
  6. 6

    Softgen

    #6 in ai app builders · quietly the best value, with a full github repo per project

    79/100

    verdictthe underrated value pick: a yearly license plus wholesale pay-as-you-go credits, and a full unrestricted private github repo for every project. less polish and momentum than the leaders, but the ownership and price are excellent.

    Softgen vs Same.new
     Same.newSoftgen
    price$10/mo (Basic)~$33/yr + pay-as-you-go credits
    free tieryesno
    buildsweb app drafts + ui clonesfull-stack web apps
    output stackreact-family webnext.js/ts/shadcn + supabase/firebase
    code exportdownload on paid tiersfull private github repo
    backendlightsupabase or firebase
    pricing modeltokens (no rollover)yearly license + pay-as-you-go

    switch forbudget-conscious developers who want real ownership without a subscription

    pros
    • +full unrestricted private github repo per project
    • +yearly license + wholesale pay-as-you-go, no subscription
    • +modern next.js/shadcn stack on supabase or firebase
    cons
    • smaller company, less polish and community
    • no true free tier (small credit purchase to start)
    • pay-as-you-go can add up on heavy use
  7. 7

    Base44

    #7 in ai app builders · polished, batteries-included — and now owned by wix

    76/100

    verdicta polished all-in-one with a built-in database, auth and integrations — great for non-technical builders, but more platform-bound than bolt or softgen, and pricier since the wix acquisition.

    Base44 vs Same.new
     Same.newBase44
    price$10/mo (Basic)$16/mo (Starter, billed annually)
    free tieryesyes
    buildsweb app drafts + ui clonesfull-stack web apps
    output stackreact-family webown all-in-one platform
    code exportdownload on paid tiersplatform-bound (verify)
    backendlightbuilt-in db + auth
    pricing modeltokens (no rollover)dual credits (message + integration)

    switch fornon-technical builders who want everything built in and don't need to leave the platform

    pros
    • +polished, batteries-included: built-in db, auth, integrations
    • +friendly for non-technical builders
    • +well-funded (wix-owned), strong momentum
    cons
    • more platform-bound — confirm export before committing
    • effective cost rose ~15-30% post-wix acquisition
    • dual-credit system complicates cost estimates
  8. 8

    Tempo

    #8 in ai app builders · planning-first: diagrams before code

    73/100

    verdicta yc-backed, planning-first builder that maps user flows and architecture before writing react — a disciplined approach that reduces slop, though it's smaller than the leaders and the assisted tier is enterprise-priced.

    Tempo vs Same.new
     Same.newTempo
    price$10/mo (Basic)$30/mo (Pro)
    free tieryesyes
    buildsweb app drafts + ui clonesfull-stack react apps
    output stackreact-family webreact (planning-first)
    code exportdownload on paid tiersreact code (verify path)
    backendlightfull-stack react (verify provider)
    pricing modeltokens (no rollover)credits

    switch forteams that want a disciplined design-then-build workflow rather than instant slop

    pros
    • +planning-first (diagrams + architecture) reduces slop
    • +react output you can take with you
    • +yc-backed with a disciplined workflow
    cons
    • smaller and less proven than the leaders
    • human-assisted tier is enterprise-priced
    • verify export path and backend on live docs
  9. 9

    Rork

    #10 in ai app builders · the best-known prompt-to-mobile-app builder

    69/100

    verdictthe best-known way to build a cross-platform mobile app from a prompt, now with a native-swift option — but mobile store submission still has real friction, and you should confirm the export path.

    Rork vs Same.new
     Same.newRork
    price$10/mo (Basic)$25/mo (Junior)
    free tieryesyes
    buildsweb app drafts + ui clonesmobile apps (ios + android)
    output stackreact-family webreact native; native swift (max)
    code exportdownload on paid tiersverify on live docs
    backendlightexternal
    pricing modeltokens (no rollover)credits

    switch fornon-technical founders shipping a mobile app without touching xcode

    pros
    • +best-known prompt-to-mobile builder
    • +cross-platform react native plus a native-swift option
    • +path to app store and google play
    cons
    • app-store submission friction remains
    • tight daily cap on the free tier
    • verify export path on live docs
  10. 10

    a0.dev

    #11 in ai app builders · cheap prompt-to-mobile that hands you a real expo project

    67/100

    verdictthe developer-friendly mobile pick: it generates a standard, exportable expo project you can open in vs code — genuinely not locked in — for $20/mo. it's early-stage and small, but the ownership story is clean.

    a0.dev vs Same.new
     Same.newa0.dev
    price$10/mo (Basic)$20/mo (Pro)
    free tieryesyes
    buildsweb app drafts + ui clonesmobile apps (react native)
    output stackreact-family webexpo / react native
    code exportdownload on paid tiersdownload expo project
    backendlightexternal
    pricing modeltokens (no rollover)subscription

    switch fordevelopers who want a cheap, portable react native starting point

    pros
    • +generates a standard, exportable expo project
    • +open it in vs code — genuinely not locked in
    • +cheap at $20/mo
    cons
    • early-stage and small
    • app-focused — external backends
    • less polish than the market leaders
+ 5 more tested, not detailed here
we ranked 16 ai app builders in total. the 5 that didn't make this page are written up in the full ranking →

how these were compared

every tool on this page went through the same test as Same.new — same tasks, same order, scored the same way. the comparison tables are the figures from that testing, not vendor spec sheets.

the ai app builders test in full →
was this useful?