Claude Code
an agent that lives in the terminal and touches the whole repo
the strongest agentic coding tool we tested — it finds the right files without being told, and it actually runs the tests before claiming it's done.
claude code is not an autocomplete product. you give it a task, it explores the repo, reads what it needs, makes changes across as many files as the task requires, runs the test suite, and iterates on failures. in practice it is the one that most consistently gets to a working end state on a task you'd describe in a sentence rather than a spec.
the difference shows most on bugs whose root cause is a couple of files away from the failure. the common failure mode across this category is patching the symptom — or quietly editing the test until it passes — and this is the tool least prone to both.
the description above is ours, condensed from the ranking. pricing moves — check it on the vendor's own page before you rely on it.
- category
- ai coding assistants
- pricing
- included with Claude Pro ($20/mo) / Max; api usage billed separately
- website
- claude.com
the strongest agentic coding tool we tested — it finds the right files without being told, and it actually runs the tests before claiming it's done.
we researched this category against vendors' own pricing pages and licence files. that is where this line comes from — not from the vendor, and not from anything they paid for.
more ai coding assistants
Cursor
we checked this$20 / monththe ai editor most teams actually standardise on
GitHub Copilot
we checked this$10 / month individualthe default, and the easiest to get through procurement